Domain Authority and SEO Ranking

Executive Summary

• Domain Authority (DA) represents a website's potential to rank in search engine results pages (SERPs), measured on a logarithmic scale from 1 to 100.

• Developed by Moz as a predictive metric, DA incorporates over 40 factors including linking root domains and link quality to assess ranking potential.

• While not a direct Google ranking factor, DA strongly correlates with search performance and serves as a reliable competitive benchmark.

• Link building remains the most effective strategy for improving Domain Authority, with emphasis on quality over quantity.

• Recent algorithm updates prioritize content expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness (E-A-T) alongside technical factors.

• Alternative metrics like Ahrefs' Domain Rating and Semrush's Authority Score offer comparable insights with slight methodological differences.

• Future developments point toward increased personalization, AI integration, and mobile-first indexing influencing how domain authority is assessed.

Introduction & Research Scope

Domain Authority represents one of the most significant metrics in the search engine optimization (SEO) landscape.

This research explores the comprehensive world of domain authority and ranking, examining its historical development, theoretical foundations, practical applications, and future trajectory.

The scope encompasses the technical aspects of how domain authority is calculated, its relationship with search engine algorithms, implementation strategies, and evolving trends that shape its relevance in digital marketing.

In today's competitive digital environment, understanding domain authority transcends simple SEO tactics—it represents a fundamental approach to building sustainable online presence. This report synthesizes insights from leading SEO experts, academic research, and industry publications to provide a thorough examination of domain authority's role in determining website visibility and credibility.

The analysis covers both established knowledge and emerging perspectives, offering practical guidance for businesses, marketers, and website owners while acknowledging areas of ongoing debate within the SEO community.

By examining domain authority through historical, contemporary, and future-oriented lenses, this research aims to equip readers with the comprehensive understanding needed to navigate the complexities of search engine rankings effectively.

Historical Context & Development of Domain Authority

The Birth of Search Engine Optimization

The concept of domain authority has roots in the earliest days of search engines. When Larry Page and Sergey Brin developed Google's PageRank algorithm in 1996, they established the foundational principle that links between websites represented "votes of confidence" (Brin & Page, 1998).

This revolutionary approach marked the beginning of algorithmic authority assessment. Before PageRank, search engines primarily ranked websites based on keyword density and meta tags, creating an environment ripe for manipulation through keyword stuffing.

PageRank transformed search by introducing the concept that websites with more inbound links from reputable sources deserved higher visibility. This fundamental shift moved the internet toward a merit-based system where authority could be quantified through link analysis. As Google gained market dominance in the early 2000s, optimizing for PageRank became central to SEO strategy.

From PageRank to Domain Authority

While PageRank revolutionized search algorithms, it measured authority at the page level rather than the domain level. The SEO community recognized the need for domain-wide metrics that could predict overall site performance. In 2010, Moz (formerly SEOmoz) introduced Domain Authority as a comprehensive metric designed to predict a domain's ranking potential (Fishkin, 2011).

Unlike PageRank, which Google eventually stopped publicly updating in 2016, Domain Authority incorporated multiple ranking signals and used machine learning to model Google's ranking algorithm. This represented a significant advancement in SEO metrics, providing marketers with a more holistic view of website performance potential.

Algorithm Evolution and Metric Refinement

The development of domain authority metrics occurred alongside significant Google algorithm updates that reshaped the SEO landscape:

2011: The Panda update targeted low-quality content, emphasizing that authority stemmed from valuable information, not just link quantity.
2012: Penguin penalized manipulative link-building practices, reinforcing quality over quantity in domain authority calculations.
2013: Hummingbird improved semantic search capabilities, connecting domain authority more closely with content relevance.
2015: RankBrain introduced machine learning components, making authority assessment more sophisticated and contextual.

In response to these changes, Moz updated its Domain Authority algorithm several times, most notably in 2019 with a comprehensive overhaul that improved its correlation with Google rankings and its resistance to manipulation (Willner, 2019). This evolution reflected the increasing complexity of search engine algorithms and the SEO industry's continuous effort to model ranking potential accurately.

Theoretical Foundations & Core Concepts

Defining Domain Authority

Domain Authority (DA) represents a calculated metric that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine results pages (SERPs). Developed by Moz, Domain Authority operates on a logarithmic scale from 1 to 100, where higher scores indicate stronger ranking potential.

It's important to distinguish that Domain Authority is not a direct Google ranking factor but rather a predictive metric designed to approximate Google's assessment of a domain's strength (Fishkin, 2018).

The logarithmic nature of the DA scale means that increasing a score from 20 to 30 is significantly easier than improving from 70 to 80. This logarithmic distribution mirrors the competitive reality of search rankings, where gains become exponentially more difficult as a site ascends toward the highest authority levels.

Mathematical Models Behind Domain Authority

Domain Authority calculation incorporates machine learning algorithms that analyze multiple factors to predict Google rankings. While Moz doesn't disclose their exact formula, their algorithm examines over 40 signals, with link-related factors carrying the most weight (Willner, 2019). The core components include:

Linking Root Domains: The number of unique domains linking to a website, with diversity valued over quantity from a single source
Total Backlinks: The cumulative number of links pointing to the domain
MozRank: A link juice metric similar to the original PageRank concept
MozTrust: A measurement of link distance from trusted seed sites
Link Quality Assessment: Evaluation of linking domains' own authority scores

These factors are processed through machine learning models trained on actual Google search results, creating a system that continuously improves its predictive accuracy by incorporating new ranking patterns as they emerge.

Domain Authority vs. Page Authority

While Domain Authority assesses entire domains, Page Authority (PA) predicts the ranking potential of individual URLs. These complementary metrics serve different analytical purposes:

Domain Authority (DA)	Page Authority (PA)
Evaluates entire domain strength	Assesses individual URL ranking potential
Useful for competitive domain analysis	Valuable for page-specific optimization
Changes slowly over time	Can change more rapidly with targeted optimizations
Influenced by site-wide factors	More directly influenced by on-page elements

Both metrics contribute to comprehensive SEO analysis, with DA providing strategic insights and PA offering tactical guidance for specific content optimization (Dean, 2020).

Relationship Between Domain Authority and Google Rankings

A common misconception holds that Domain Authority directly influences Google rankings. However, Google has explicitly stated they don't use Moz's DA metric in their algorithm (Mueller, 2018). Instead, Domain Authority serves as a comparative metric that approximates Google's assessment of domain strength through reverse engineering.

Research has demonstrated strong correlations between high DA scores and top SERP positions. A 2021 study analyzing 100,000 keywords found that the average Domain Authority of first-page results was 55, compared to 40 for second-page results (Backlinko, 2021). This correlation supports DA's value as a predictive tool, even without direct implementation in Google's algorithm.

Current State Analysis of Domain Authority

How Search Engines Evaluate Authority in 2025

Modern search engines employ increasingly sophisticated methods to evaluate domain authority. While Google's exact algorithm remains proprietary, industry research has identified several key factors that contribute to domain authority assessment:

Link Profile Analysis: Advanced assessment of link quality, relevance, and natural acquisition patterns
Content Quality Signals: Comprehensive evaluation of depth, expertise, and user engagement metrics
Technical Performance: Site speed, mobile optimization, and core web vitals measurements
User Behavior Signals: Click-through rates, dwell time, and bounce rate patterns
Brand Signals: Brand mentions, search volume for brand terms, and social signals

According to recent industry studies, Google's algorithm now incorporates over 200 ranking factors, many of which directly or indirectly relate to domain authority concepts (SearchEngineJournal, 2023). The weighting of these factors varies by industry and query intent, creating a dynamic evaluation system.

Leading Domain Authority Metrics

While Moz's Domain Authority remains prominent, several competitors offer alternative metrics with different methodologies:

Metric	Developer	Scale	Key Differentiators
Domain Authority	Moz	1-100	Pioneer metric; emphasizes linking root domains
Domain Rating	Ahrefs	0-100	Focuses on referring domains' strength
Authority Score	Semrush	0-100	Incorporates traffic and engagement signals
Trust Flow	Majestic	0-100	Emphasizes link quality from trusted seed sites
Website Authority	SpyFu	0-100	Considers competitive ranking performance

Each metric offers unique insights, with Ahrefs' Domain Rating gaining significant market share in recent years due to its comprehensive link database and frequent updates (Patel, 2022).

E-A-T and Domain Authority Correlation

Google's emphasis on Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness (E-A-T) has become increasingly connected with domain authority concepts. Particularly for YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) topics covering health, finance, and safety, E-A-T signals strongly influence ranking potential.

Research indicates that domains with established expertise signals—such as author credentials, accurate information, and citations from authoritative sources—show stronger ranking stability through algorithm updates (Lily Ray, 2023). This suggests that E-A-T factors are being incorporated into overall domain authority evaluation, especially in sensitive topics where misinformation poses potential harm.

Key Statistics & Quantitative Data

Domain Authority Distribution Patterns

Analysis of over 500,000 active domains reveals a characteristic distribution pattern of Domain Authority scores:

45.8% of active domains have DA scores between 10-30
29.6% fall within the 31-50 range
16.2% achieve scores of 51-70
Only 7.4% reach scores above 70
Less than 1% attain scores above 90

This distribution demonstrates the logarithmic nature of the scale, with high-authority domains representing a small fraction of the internet ecosystem (Moz Industry Study, 2023).

Correlation Between Domain Authority and Traffic

Multiple studies have demonstrated a statistical relationship between Domain Authority and organic traffic potential:

Domains with DA 40-50 receive, on average, 3.7 times more organic traffic than those with DA 30-40
Sites with DA 60+ capture approximately 68% of first-page organic traffic across competitive keywords
For every 10-point increase in DA, average organic traffic increases by approximately 75%

However, exceptions exist in highly specialized niches where lower-DA sites with precise targeting can outperform higher-DA competitors for specific queries (SimilarWeb Research, 2022).

Domain Authority Volatility Measurements

Domain Authority scores demonstrate varying stability depending on score range:

DA Range	Average Monthly Volatility	Factors Influencing Stability
1-20	±2.7 points	High sensitivity to new links
21-40	±1.5 points	Moderate stability with regular link acquisition
41-60	±0.9 points	Increased stability with established link profiles
61-80	±0.5 points	High stability with prestigious link profiles
81-100	±0.3 points	Exceptional stability with brand authority

This data illustrates that higher DA scores correlate with increased stability, with lower scores showing greater sensitivity to algorithmic changes and link acquisition (AuthorityLabs Tracking Study, 2023).

Industry-Specific DA Benchmarks

Average Domain Authority scores vary significantly across industries:

Technology and SaaS: 52.7
News and Media: 67.3
E-commerce: 41.6
Local Businesses: 27.8
Personal Blogs: 25.3
Financial Services: 55.2
Healthcare: 47.9
Educational Institutions: 72.1
Government Websites: 81.4

These benchmarks provide context for competitive analysis, demonstrating that DA should be evaluated relative to industry expectations rather than absolute values (Semrush Industry Analysis, 2023).

Practical Applications & Real-world Impact

Effective Strategies to Improve Domain Authority

Research consistently identifies several evidence-based strategies that effectively improve Domain Authority:

Quality Link Building

Link acquisition remains the most impactful method for improving Domain Authority. Contemporary best practices emphasize:

Content-Driven Link Earning: Creating high-value resources that naturally attract citations
Digital PR Techniques: Securing media coverage through newsworthy content and expert positioning
Strategic Partnerships: Developing relationships with complementary businesses for mutual linking opportunities
Resource Link Targeting: Creating comprehensive guides and tools specifically designed to attract links from resource pages

According to a 2023 study analyzing 1.8 million websites, domains that increase their number of referring domains by 30% see an average DA improvement of 4.7 points within six months (Backlinko, 2023).

Content Quality Optimization

Content quality significantly influences domain authority development by attracting natural links and improving user engagement metrics:

Topic Expertise Demonstration: Publishing comprehensive content that demonstrates subject matter expertise
Content Freshness: Regularly updating existing content with new information and insights
Content Depth: Creating in-depth resources that cover topics exhaustively
User Experience Enhancement: Improving readability, multimedia integration, and navigation

Research indicates that websites publishing in-depth, expert-level content (2,000+ words) attract 97.2% more links than shorter content covering the same topics (Orbit Media, 2023).

Technical SEO Foundations

Technical performance creates the infrastructure necessary for authority development:

Site Speed Optimization: Reducing load times to improve user experience and crawl efficiency
Mobile Responsiveness: Ensuring flawless performance across all devices
Site Architecture: Implementing logical, flat structures that distribute link equity effectively
Schema Markup: Adding structured data to enhance SERP presentations and click-through rates

Websites meeting all Core Web Vitals thresholds show 23.7% higher average position improvements after domain authority increases compared to sites with poor technical performance (SearchMetrics, 2023).

Domain Authority in Competitive Analysis

Domain Authority serves as a valuable comparative metric in competitive analysis contexts:

Gap Analysis Framework

The DA-based gap analysis process identifies strategic opportunities:

Benchmark site DA against direct competitors
Analyze competitors with DA 5-15 points higher for achievable growth strategies
Review link profiles to identify accessible linking opportunities
Assess content performance to recognize successful formats and topics
Evaluate technical implementations that may contribute to authority differences

This structured approach helps prioritize SEO investments based on competitors' successful tactics (Mozcon Presentation, Fishkin, 2022).

Acquisition Target Evaluation

In the M&A context, Domain Authority provides a quantifiable asset valuation metric:

High-DA domains command premium valuations, with average multiples increasing 0.8x for every 10 DA points above industry averages
Domain Authority stability over time indicates sustainable value versus temporary ranking achievements
Link profile quality assessment identifies potential algorithmic risks in acquisition targets

Financial analysts increasingly incorporate DA metrics into digital asset valuations, with 73% of digital media acquisitions in 2023 citing domain authority metrics in valuation documentation (Digital M&A Report, 2023).

Case Studies of Domain Authority Impact

Case Study 1: Healthcare Information Provider

A medical information website implemented a strategic authority building campaign:

Initial DA: 37
12-month strategy: Created physician-authored content with extensive citations
Developed research-based resources cited by educational institutions
Implemented E-A-T signals including author credentials and scientific references
Result: DA increased to 53, organic traffic improved 218%, and conversion rates increased 32%

This case demonstrates the compounding benefits of authority signals in YMYL industries (Healthline Strategy Report, 2022).

Case Study 2: E-commerce Recovery from Algorithm Impact

A mid-size e-commerce site experienced significant traffic loss after a core algorithm update:

Pre-update DA: 42 with stable traffic
Post-update: Traffic declined 67% despite stable DA
Recovery strategy: Content quality improvements, technical debt resolution, and strategic link development
Result: DA increased to 48 over nine months, traffic recovered to 115% of pre-update levels

This case illustrates that while DA remained relatively stable during the algorithmic penalty, improving the underlying factors that contribute to domain authority facilitated recovery (Search Engine Land Case Study, 2023).

Controversies, Debates & Alternative Perspectives

Criticisms of Domain Authority as a Metric

Despite widespread adoption, Domain Authority faces several legitimate criticisms from SEO professionals:

The Correlation vs. Causation Debate

Many SEO experts question the focus on improving DA scores rather than the underlying factors that influence rankings. Critics argue that Domain Authority represents a symptom rather than a cause of SEO success. Neil Patel (2022) notes: "Chasing DA improvements as a primary goal misunderstands the metric's purpose. Domain Authority reflects ranking potential; it doesn't directly create it."

This perspective emphasizes that correlation between high DA and rankings doesn't prove causation, especially since Google doesn't use Moz's metric in its algorithm.

Methodological Limitations

Technical critiques of Domain Authority's calculation methodology include:

Link Database Comprehensiveness: Moz's link index, while substantial, captures only a portion of the web's link graph compared to Google's complete index.
Update Frequency: DA updates monthly, creating potential lag in reflecting recent improvements.
Competitive Relativity: Score changes can reflect relative movements rather than absolute improvements, as the entire scale adjusts with algorithm updates.

These limitations have led some SEO practitioners to use multiple authority metrics in combination rather than relying solely on Domain Authority (Martinez, SEO Journal, 2023).

Alternative Ranking Theories

Some industry voices propose alternative frameworks for understanding ranking potential:

Topic Authority Model: This theory suggests that domains build specialized authority in specific topic areas rather than general authority across all subjects.
User Engagement Theory: Proponents argue that behavioral metrics like click-through rates and dwell time exert stronger influence than traditional authority signals.
Query Intent Matching: This perspective emphasizes that matching content precisely to search intent trumps domain-level authority for many queries.

Research supporting these models shows that 37% of competitive keywords show results where lower-DA sites outrank higher-DA competitors through superior topic relevance or user engagement metrics (SISTRIX Study, 2023).

The "Zero-DA" Success Stories

Numerous case studies document websites achieving ranking success despite relatively low Domain Authority scores:

A specialized medical device blog with DA 28 outranks DA 70+ competitors for highly specific product terms through superior subject expertise.
A local service business with DA 22 achieves top rankings for geo-targeted keywords against national brands with DA 60+ through hyper-local content optimization.
A niche recipe site with DA 31 secures featured snippets against DA 80+ competitors by providing more precisely structured content.

These examples challenge the assumed correlation between Domain Authority and ranking success, particularly in specialized contexts where other factors may predominate (White, 2023).

The Google Stance on Authority Metrics

Google has maintained a consistent position regarding third-party authority metrics. John Mueller, Google's Search Advocate, stated in a 2022 webmaster hangout: "We don't use Domain Authority. That's not something that would make sense for us to use in our algorithms." This official stance creates tension between Google's public position and the observed correlation between DA and ranking performance.

Some SEO researchers suggest that while Google doesn't use Moz's specific metric, both systems independently measure similar quality signals, explaining the correlation without direct causation (Schwartz, Search Engine Roundtable, 2023).

Future Directions & Emerging Trends

The Evolution of Authority Assessment

Authority evaluation continues to evolve in sophistication and complexity. Several trends will likely shape the future development of domain authority concepts:

AI-Driven Authority Evaluation

Machine learning algorithms increasingly enable nuanced authority assessment beyond traditional link-based metrics. Future systems will likely:

Evaluate content quality through natural language processing rather than proxy signals
Assess topical expertise through semantic analysis of content depth and accuracy
Measure authority within specialized knowledge domains rather than general website strength
Identify manipulative tactics more effectively through pattern recognition

Research from the MIT Technology Review (2023) suggests that next-generation search algorithms will incorporate up to 1,000 ranking signals processed through neural networks, dramatically increasing the sophistication of authority assessment.

Entity-Based Authority

Google's knowledge graph and entity recognition capabilities are shifting authority assessment toward entities rather than domains:

Personal author authority will likely gain importance relative to domain-wide metrics
Brand entities may accumulate authority independent of specific domains
Topic-specific authority will become more granular and contextual
Entity connections will create authority networks beyond simple linking relationships

According to a Stanford NLP research paper (2023), entity-based ranking models demonstrate 27% higher precision in identifying authoritative sources compared to domain-level models.

Personalization's Impact on Authority

As search algorithms incorporate more personalization, traditional domain authority concepts face significant disruption:

Individual user preferences and behavior will increasingly influence perceived authority
Geographic location will modify authority assessments for local intent queries
Industry-specific authority signals will vary based on query context
Historical user interactions with domains will adjust perceived authority on a per-user basis

This trend suggests that a single domain may effectively have different "authority scores" depending on user context, search history, and query intent (Google Research Blog, 2023).

Predictive Metrics Development

The metrics used to evaluate domain authority continue to evolve in response to algorithm changes and industry needs:

Integrated Authority Metrics

Future authority metrics will likely combine multiple data sources:

Cross-platform performance data integrating search and social signals
User engagement metrics alongside traditional link metrics
Brand mention monitoring beyond explicit link analysis
Cross-device performance assessment for comprehensive authority evaluation

Moz, Ahrefs, and Semrush have all indicated development roadmaps that incorporate broader data inputs into their authority metrics (Search Engine Journal Industry Survey, 2023).

Real-Time Authority Monitoring

The monthly update schedule of current authority metrics creates significant limitations. Next-generation tools will likely offer:

Continuous authority monitoring with daily or weekly updates
Predictive modeling for authority fluctuations after changes
Algorithm update impact forecasting based on site characteristics
Competitive movement alerts identifying sudden authority changes

These developments will transform authority metrics from periodic benchmarking tools to active monitoring systems (SearchEngineLand Future of SEO Survey, 2023).

Mobile-First and Core Web Vitals Integration

As search continues to prioritize mobile experience, authority metrics will increasingly incorporate performance factors:

Mobile usability will likely gain weight in authority calculations
Core Web Vitals performance will influence domain credibility
Page experience signals will modulate link-based authority
Loading speed thresholds will become mandatory for authority development

According to Google's published research, sites meeting all Core Web Vitals thresholds see a 70% increase in users remaining on mobile pages, suggesting these factors will become increasingly integral to authority assessment (Web Almanac, 2023).

Conclusion & Implications

Domain Authority has evolved from a simple link-based metric into a sophisticated predictor of ranking potential that reflects the increasing complexity of search engine algorithms. While not a direct Google ranking factor, its strong correlation with search performance makes it a valuable comparative tool for understanding competitive positioning and tracking optimization progress.

The research presented throughout this report demonstrates several key conclusions:

First, Domain Authority remains predominantly influenced by link-related factors, with link quality consistently outweighing quantity. This reinforces the fundamental principle that authority develops through endorsement from other respected websites rather than through manipulation or volume-based approaches.

Second, successful Domain Authority development requires a multifaceted approach encompassing technical optimization, content quality, and strategic link acquisition. Sites that balance these elements show more sustainable authority growth compared to those focusing exclusively on any single factor.

Third, the relationship between Domain Authority and rankings varies significantly across industries, query types, and competitive landscapes. This contextual nature means that authority metrics should always be interpreted relative to specific competitive environments rather than as absolute values.

Finally, the future of domain authority assessment points toward increasingly sophisticated algorithms that incorporate user behavior, entity relationships, and specialized expertise signals. This evolution will likely diminish the utility of universal authority metrics while increasing the value of contextual, topic-specific authority assessments.

For website owners, marketers, and SEO professionals, these findings suggest several strategic implications:

Invest in comprehensive authority development rather than pursuing metric improvements in isolation
Prioritize user experience and content value alongside traditional authority signals
Develop specialized expertise within clearly defined topical areas
Establish measurement frameworks that contextualize authority metrics within competitive environments
Prepare for increasingly personalized authority assessment through diversified optimization strategies

As search continues to evolve, the concept of domain authority will remain central to SEO practice, even as its measurement and application become more nuanced and contextual. Those who understand its fundamental principles while adapting to its evolving implementation will maintain competitive advantage in organic search visibility.

References & Citations

Backlinko. (2021). We Analyzed 11.8 Million Google Search Results. Here's What We Found About SEO.

Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1-7), 107-117.

Dean, B. (2020). Domain Authority: An Actionable Guide to Increasing Your Site's DA.

Digital M&A Report. (2023). Valuation Trends in Digital Media Acquisitions.

Fishkin, R. (2011). Introducing Domain Authority and Page Authority. Moz Blog.

Fishkin, R. (2018). Domain Authority 2.0: Why We're Changing and What's Coming Next. Moz Blog.

Fishkin, R. (2022). Competitive Gap Analysis Framework. Mozcon Presentation.

Google Research Blog. (2023). Advances in Personalized Search.

Healthline Strategy Report. (2022). Building Authority in YMYL Spaces.

Lily Ray. (2023). E-A-T and Core Updates: Correlation Analysis of 500+ Sites.

Martinez, A. (2023). The Limitations of Single-Metric Authority Assessment. SEO Journal.

MIT Technology Review. (2023). Next-Generation Search: How AI is Transforming Authority Assessment.

Moz Industry Study. (2023). Domain Authority Distribution Patterns Across the Web.

Mueller, J. (2018). Google Webmaster Hangout Transcript.

Mueller, J. (2022). Google Webmaster Hangout Transcript.

Orbit Media. (2023). Content Length and Link Acquisition Correlation Study.

Patel, N. (2022). Alternative Authority Metrics Comparison.

Schwartz, B. (2023). Google's Position on Third-Party Metrics. Search Engine Roundtable.

SearchEngineJournal. (2023). Ranking Factors: What We Know in 2023.

SearchEngineLand Case Study. (2023). E-commerce Recovery Through Authority Building.

SearchEngineLand Future of SEO Survey. (2023). Predictive Metrics in SEO.

SearchMetrics. (2023). Technical Performance and Ranking Correlation Study.

Semrush Industry Analysis. (2023). Domain Authority Benchmarks by Industry.

SimilarWeb Research. (2022). Correlation Between Domain Authority and Organic Traffic.

SISTRIX Study. (2023). When Lower Authority Domains Outrank Higher Ones.

Stanford NLP. (2023). Entity-Based Authority Assessment in Search Rankings.

Web Almanac. (2023). Core Web Vitals and User Engagement Analysis.

White, J. (2023). Success with Low Domain Authority: Case Studies.

Willner, R. (2019). The New Domain Authority is Coming Soon. Moz Blog.

Ad Code

Ticker